Jesus' Bloodline, Sir Laurence Gardner Options

[nckk]

"According to Sir Laurence Gardner, Mary Magdalene was already three months pregnant at the time of the Crucifixion, since she and Jesus had cemented their Second Marriage at the Bethany anointing in March 33AD. In September of what would have been Jesus' 39th birthday, a daughter was born to Mary, her name being Tamar, meaning `Palm Tree'-The Tree of Life, as we have already said. It is appropriate since it would be she who carried on Jesus' bloodline, the bloodline in Judaism always passing through the matriarchal side of the family. Jesus and Mary then had two other children. Their second child was a son, also named Jesus (AD 37). Then upon Mary's arrival in Marseilles with Lazarus (Simon Zelotes), Martha, and Joseph of Arimathea, Mary gave birth in AD 44 to what some say was another son, but was in fact another a girl, in Provence. Another female would mean another source by which the bloodline of Jesus could be further carried on. Another daughter was also another means by which the Luciferian gene could be more heavily implanted into humanity.

In the Rosicrucian pamphlet, The Chemical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz, it speaks specifically of "a mysterious girl-child of royal blood" who is washed ashore in a boat, whose rightful heritage has fallen into Islamic hands."
Sir Laurence Gardner

Much energy is laid in this study of ´the bloodline of Jesus. I ask, what is the importance of this investigation? Is it only fuel for our mystical mind or does this physical heritage, blood link have any importance - except the historical. To me it seems that far to much importance is lain on the material aspect neglecting the aspect of the creative spirit. Isn’t the time passed where the blood heritage is of any importance at all?